AIMDALL

Legal & Ethical Disclaimer

This report is published by Aimdall.Ai and provides an independent assessment of publicly accessible AI Conversational Agents.

The objective is to promote AI security, ethical AI usage, and compliance awareness. The findings in this report are based on publicly available interactions with AI Conversational Agents and do not involve unauthorized access, data breaches, or private system intrusion. We ensure that all assessments were conducted in compliance with applicable laws and ethical guidelines including web scraping regulations. No unauthorized data extraction, disruption of services, or actions causing harm to AI systems or their providers were performed during this evaluation.

Data Privacy & Compliance

This analysis does not collect, store, process, or share any personally identifiable information (PII) from AI interactions. All data referenced is derived from publicly available AI Conversational Agents, ensuring compliance with applicable privacy laws.

Fair Use and Intellectual Property

This report respects the intellectual property rights of AI Conversational Agent providers and their respective AI models. Any references to specific AI platforms, agent brands, or company names are made solely for factual reporting, evaluation, and transparency. This report does not claim ownership of third-party AI-generated content.

We acknowledge that AI-generated responses may be influenced by proprietary training data and algorithms. If any organization believes that this report misrepresents their AI system, we welcome direct communication for revision or clarification.

Accuracy, Scope & Limitations

The evaluation presented in this report is based on:

  • AUTOMATED (AI-DRIVEN) ASSESSMENTS to identify response patterns and potential risks.
  • MANUAL EVALUATION of AI responses to validate fi ndings and ensure interpretability.

While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and fairness, this report is based on a combination of AI and human analysis, which may contain errors or misinterpretations. The assessment process is inherently limited by factors such as:

  • The dynamic nature of AI systems, which may update and change responses over time.
  • The inability to access proprietary or private AI model configurations, meaning results are based solely on publicly available interactions.
  • Variability in AI behavior, which may result in inconsistencies across different testing conditions.

For these reasons, findings in this report should not be interpreted as definitive judgments on an AI system’s long-term reliability or security. This report does not serve as a legally binding compliance certification and should not replace official security audits conducted by certified professionals.

In addition to the independent evaluations detailed in this report, Aimdall.AI may also conduct on-demand assessments of AI Conversational Agents at the explicit request of organizations. These client-requested analyses are governed by the same ethical principles, legal standards, and data privacy protocols outlined in this document.

Such on-demand assessments may include:

  • Evaluation of non-public or enterprise-deployed AI systems, with explicit authorization from the owning organization.
  • Custom risk assessments, bias analysis, or compliance validation tailored to specific use cases or industries.
  • Advisory support for improving AI governance, ethical design, and user interaction quality.

We emphasize that:

  • All on-demand analyses are conducted with client consent and authorized access only.
  • No personally identifiable information (PII), user credentials, or proprietary data is stored, shared, or used beyond the scope of the requested analysis.
  • The results from on-demand projects are confidential and shared exclusively with the requesting party, unless mutual agreement allows otherwise.

These services aim to empower organizations to proactively identify and mitigate AI-related risks, and to align their conversational systems with ethical, regulatory, and operational standards.

AI Bias & Ethical Considerations

AI models are trained on large datasets that may contain inherent biases, which can influence AI-generated responses in various ways:

  • ACCURACY & FAIRNESS - AI outputs may unintentionally favor or exclude certain perspectives.
  • ETHICAL RISKS – AI Conversational Agents may generate biased, misleading, or inappropriate content if not properly monitored.
  • ACCOUNTABILITY – Responsibility for AI-generated responses remains with the organizations deploying these systems.

This report does not modify or manipulate AI responses but objectively evaluates their security, compliance, and ethical reliability. The purpose is to raise awareness of AI risks and encourage responsible AI governance.

Responsible Disclosure & No Defamation Intended

This report is intended to enhance AI security, ethical governance, and compliance awareness. It is not intended to defame, misrepresent, or harm any company, AI provider, or AI Conversational Agent developer.

If any organization referenced in this report believes it has been misrepresented, it may request a revision via the contact details provided below.

No Unauthorized Access or Web Scraping

All AI Conversational Agent interactions assessed in this report were accessed through publicly available interfaces in compliance with:

  • EU ePrivacy Directive (Cookie & Tracking Laws)
  • U.S. Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA)
  • UK Computer Misuse Act

This assessment did not involve unauthorized data extraction (web scraping), service disruption, or any action that could harm AI providers or violate platform terms of service. All findings are based on legitimate interactions with publicly accessible AI systems, ensuring compliance with ethical and legal standards.

Liability Disclaimer

This report is provided “as is”, without any express or implied warranties regarding its accuracy, completeness, or fitness for a particular purpose. Aimdall.ai and its affiliates disclaim all liability for any misinterpretations, direct or indirect damages, or business decisions made based on this report.

For official security assessments, businesses should consult with certified cybersecurity experts and legal professionals.